Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gardito
Rounding up, I believe MV did not have the business sense to do business in DR the right way. I also believe that they should not have brought the material over if they didn’t have everything squared away on the receiving end.
|
Thanks for the interesting perspective on the situation. I must ask, though, what your interest in this affair is and what drove you to look to into the issue into such depth. While what you have written sounds authoritative, you've given us no real explanation of who you really are and why we should believe your "inside skinny," as you call it, over any of the other theories, explanations, etc. that have been offered on this incident.
Your last paragraph makes two good points, to which I will repeat a third I made along time ago in this thread and I have yet to see adequately addressed by anyone defending or giving benefit of the doubt to this shipment:
Quote:
|
there remains the question of whether or not this shipment was even legal, whether toxic or non-toxic. I have tried to point out the ambiguities I see on this point under existing Dominican law and its treaty obligations; I leave it to a lawyer to clarify the point for us.
|
The Environment Forum Moderator
