Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nal0whs
You were gearing the discussion towards whether the metro was a good/bad decision and this thread is not about the metro!
Regardless if you are the moderator of this thread, that still does not changes the fact that this thread is not about the metro!
You wanted an answer to what Leonel would have been doing towards the issue of pollution, the metro certainly would have given people another mode of transportation as oppose to smoke belching cars and buses. I also made note of the negative view that was received with and that was that.
Anything else about the metro is not in accordance with the purpose and title of this thread, regardless of who the moderator is.
-NAL
|
Nals,
Wordsmith all you want, but
you suggested the metro was a policy response to the air pollution problem. I am responding, in the name of your much cherished "balance," that the metro was not a
serious response to the air pollution problem -- in fact, I have my doubts that air pollution figured stongly and seriously in the proposal's development at all. I suggested -- re-read my prior posts -- that there were other motivations, not pollution abatement, in play.
And no matter what you post, Nals, this is in line with the thread's subject matter, no matter who or what you really are.
Keith