Quote:
Originally Posted by NALs
For certain that's a plausible possibility, but it's not clear if the two are connected or not. For that reason, any of the two possibilities (it's connected or it's not connected) are both very real at this moment in time. -NALs
|
Are you for real?
Say somebody accuses a certain NALs of being behind the Madrid train bombing. At the moment it is not clear you're connected to that event, but it is not absoluteley clear you weren't, so any of the two possibilities are very real at this moment of time.... . If someone would accuse you of being connected to the Madrid train bombings, would you feel it was you who had to prove you are not connected (you destroyed all the evidence didn't you...
), or should the one accusing you be able to prove your connection? And if he/she couldn't wouldnt you agree that that was slander, and maybe take appropriate steps?
Was this 'story' really worth a poll???