Quote:
Originally Posted by qgrande
 Are you for real?
Say somebody accuses a certain NALs of being behind the Madrid train bombing. At the moment it is not clear you're connected to that event, but it is not absoluteley clear you weren't, so any of the two possibilities are very real at this moment of time.... . If someone would accuse you of being connected to the Madrid train bombings, would you feel it was you who had to prove you are not connected (you destroyed all the evidence didn't you...  ), or should the one accusing you be able to prove your connection? And if he/she couldn't wouldnt you agree that that was slander, and maybe take appropriate steps?
Was this 'story' really worth a poll??? |
The accuser should be able to prove it.
And if it turns out to be false, well then, there is only one thing that can be done and it's called APOLOGY.
The story was not worth a poll, but the opinions of DR1ers certainly is. A poll makes it easier to grasp where many DR1ers stand concerning this issue.
-NALs