Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith R
Kyoto is flawed, no doubt, but it is due to expire in 5 years anyway. It does have some flexibility in how its commitments can be met, however, so I don't buy the apocalyptic vision you offer of its implementation.
|
Folks with a good understanding of macro economic systems have serious disagreement with Kyoto. It is well beyond flawed. It starts with badly flawed and faulty science. One would assume that before the world is thrown into ~potential~ economic chaos, it would be based on clear, solid science.
And one would hope that the folks promoting such a flawed plan, with the incredibly high cost/benefit that could result in significant negative planetary economic consequences, would be ethically purer than Caesars' wife.
But, alas, none of it is to be. Corrupt officials offering badly flawed science that could result in an ugly world economic climate, especially within the developed nations. I'm not the only one who understands the possibilities to think it's really bad mojo...