Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
The Stern Review
Hang in there ... it is big and I predict that it will be read in its entirety by very few
|
I have seen that before.
So the country that commissioned what became the IPCC in the first place then commissions another gubmint branch to do a "study" to lessen the economic blow of the IPCC mandates? And we're 'sposed to believe that, too?
Did YOU actually read what he stated in the Executive Summary? His postulates and basis? Girl, it's BASED on the faulty science the IPCC promotes!!!!!!!!!!!
Did YOU even read it? It says the "rich" countries must decrease their carbon emissions by 60-80% by 2050, and the Third World-this includes China and India-don't have to do squat. I'd cut and paste a TON from it, but it's in read-only .pdf and cannot be done.
Okey Dokey
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chris
www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/11/pdf/energy_chapter.pdf"]Capturing the Energy Opportunity[/url]
I guess very few will read this one completely as well.
|
I'm reading this part of your post and trying to figure out if you are serious or not.
I have read this one too, loooong before you posted it.
You DO understand, no doubt, that the CAP was founded in 2003 as "the official Hillary Clinton think tank" (per the UPI). Bill Clinton's former Chief of Staff, John Podesta, was hand-picked to run it. Even the socialist publication
The Nation called it a "shadow government, kind of a Clinton White House in exile". Heck, even Hillary bragged about kicking it off. Additionally, CAP birthed the Hillary media watchdog group, Media Matters, who also gets funding from George Soros groups.
Please explain to me how I'm supposed to take an obvious political organization's study, designed to get ONE Presidential candidate elected Prez of the US, seriously. Political organizations exist for one purpose: to serve themselves and their agenda, first and foremost.