View Single Post
  #27  
Old 01-01-2008, 12:24 AM
Lambada Lambada is offline
Gold
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,917
Lambada is a splendid one to behold Lambada is a splendid one to behold Lambada is a splendid one to behold Lambada is a splendid one to behold Lambada is a splendid one to behold Lambada is a splendid one to behold Lambada is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NALs View Post
I have always been aware of the Tavera, Valdesia, Sabana Yegua, Rincon, Hatillo, Sabaneta, Maguaca and the Chacuey dams.

Until now, I was not aware of any other dams. -NALs
Standby, Nals, we're working on it for you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotLurking View Post
Lambada, from first hand knowledge I can attest to the fact that Las Barias (Bani) does NOT have a dam named Las Barias (I own some land and a shack there). My mother was born there and many family members still live there, so, I'm quite familiar with the area and the dam. The only dam considered part of Las Barias is Valdesia. Jiguey-Aguacate is considered one dam not two as listed on The INDRHI site. I have 2 cousins that have been working in Valdesia for the past 15 years and a friend that has been working in Jiguey-Aguacate since mid 2002.

I think the list on the INDRHI site is inaccurate base on what I know of the Nizao area dams or perhaps they are using some strange way of determining what a dam is. In any case I'm going to call my cousin that works in Valdesia to ask him about the Las Barias dam and also the Jiguey dam. I'll post an update when I talk to him.

NotLurking.
Oh this is going to be fun! First, find your dam..........!! I think it would be enormously helpful if you could post the info your cousin comes up with. Also if you could ask him what these are pictures of which INDRHI would have us believe are:
PRESA DE JIGUEY

PRESA AGUACATE
and
PRESA DE VALDESIA

Like A.Hidalgo I wouldn't be remotely surprised if the INDRHI website is inaccurate, so let's try to get accurate info here. I'm fairly sure there are more than 8 although 34 is probably too high. I'd personally go for somewhere between 19 & 24. Any advance on between 19 & 24? Gentleman in the corner wishes to bid? That isn't including these listed by Dag on the Olga thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dag View Post
) Two new hydroelectric projects getting underway, Palomino and Las Placetas. Both are being built in supposedly biologically protected areas (national park) without a peep. Both are being built with borrowed money. Both were justified by questionable data. Why the heck are they starting two new projects when the Presa de Gualgui stands near abandoned, half completed? Whatever happend to all the money that was invested in starting the Presa de Hondo Valle project, which has since disappeared from the planning boards? The work on the Presa de Gualgui and the Presa de Hondo Valle were done on borrowed funds as well, for which the country is now paying interest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NALs View Post
Because they are ex-reformistas, -NALs
No, there is a different significance in those appointments & it links to the Tavera tragedy according to Luis Arthur. Read his entry Nombramientos for 31st. December 2007
Luis H. Arthur S.
Reply With Quote