The minimum of partners required is 2. (You don’t need other shareholders to complete the minimum)
The name of the company does not have to be registered at ONAPI, but under the new legal provisions the last name of the partners has to be included in the name of the company.
Other characteristic is that the participation on the benefits is not negotiable. This means that neither of you can sell your part in the company to a third-party unless the other consents it. (Except for cases of divorce or inheritance from you to your beneficiaries)
now we are back to stoneage.
that law is done by idiots without any clue about small or medium sized businesses.
Pichardo, is that what you named the neccessary move to go forward??
in the deepest Congo i would not expect such stupidity.
the part i highlighted above means the follwoing:
a small businesses run by several(i.e. 3 partners) can not longer exist legally unless the partners are good for a 30 millions deposit. from my til now gathered info they can not make a transition to an SRL as 3 partners who decide together what's going on and what decisions have to be taken to run the small business. not even 2 partners can do so, because there has to be a assigned head manager who has 100% of all powers to move/operate the company. why they still need the 2nd partner for an SRL, i don't know, because it will be only 1 of them who has the power. shares can not be sold to 3rd parties, what a BS, so all til now existing partnerships, all leagl S.A.'s or CxA's til now run by a number of partners with different shares, have to fall apart and stop to exist BY LAW unless they are able to deposit 30 millions pesos minimum on a local bank account so that corrupt goverment of brainless law producers can steel it and build an other Metro instead of sending their politicians to school to learn to think.
looks like we have a new kind of idiots around making laws.
i knew that huge leak of education will have it's effects someday.
this new law is the best example.
Mike
|