Quote:
|
Some of these negative postings really crack me up. There is really no ACCOUNTABILITY here. Nals, in particular, feels completely comfortable just spewing false accusations, creating pseudo images, and insinuating unsubstantiated affiliations, all with no transparency. I guess what I say to you or Lesley D or Chiri or other positive humanitarian thinkers really gets to him.
|
Another proof that what I say HAS AN IMPACT ON DEELT AND OTHERS WHO ARE AFRAID THAT MY WAY OF THINKING IS MAKING SENSE, which for real patriotic Dominicans who see the problem before its too late, it should!
What you say Deelt doesn't really gets to me, what gets to me is how quickly you folks sucumb to failure. Failure not in the sense that you guys gave up, but in the sense that you guys stoped trying when you were beginning to have the biggest impact on the person you wanted to impact to begin with.
Think about that for a second!
Also, why do you like to use the word HUMANITARIAN alot? I mean, I know why, you want to make me seem less "humane" and yourself (and those like minded) more humane, thus making people more "warm hearted" towards your ideas. I got to hand it to you, that is a good strategy for getting those undecided minded folks into your bandwagon.
But, think about this. A humanitarian goes to a poor country and feeds the people there, literally. The humanitarian stands in front of a stewpot and hands out food. That sounds so humane and wonderful. The only problem is that its inefficient and creates dependence.
In the other hand, here comes this other person (whom you would probably consider inhumaine) and he forces these very same people to live by their means. That means they will have to starve for some time. Oh, that sounds so cruel, what an evil person that is, right?
Well, it just turns out that that person decided to not feed the people (thus they are starving) but to teach them how to defend and feed themselves. While they make a slight SACRIFICE of not eating, they are filling their brains with knowledge that will serve them well. Once they have full knowledge of how to denfend and feed themselves, the so called "evil helper" leaves forever, but the people he leaves behind now walk around with a filled belly!
The humanitarian leaves and the people it leaves behind go right back to starving!
Which is better, a nice image today but with dire consequences in the future, or being criticized to death but leaving a mark in this world that will be revised and fully understood once the impact has well gotten through?
Think about that for a second too!
Quote:
|
Last time I checked I was speaking with like minded people.
|
Winston Churchill once said that the best way to measure a real leader's achievement is by the number of criticism it gets.
Hmm, why? Well, if you are not being criticized, you are not doing your job right! The point of being a leader is to create change in society AND to impose what's right for society. Those actions always bring out criticisms of some sort.
The fact that you and Lesley prefer to be in "like minded" groups is really weird for people that are trying to impose change in society! I thought people like you would immense yourselves in contradictory minded people to ensure and compare your ideas to that of their own. If your ideas were as "sound" and correct then they should be getting into the minds of the opposite minded person!
I guess you stopped digging three feet from gold! In other words, you people quit too easily, that is why you will never see any effect on society that you are trying to impose!
Quote:
|
You can lead a bull to water but can't make him drink. God save us all from these people if they ever come to power....another Trujillo in the making.
|
I'm sure Duarte was another Trujillo and maybe even George Washington and those Americans who decided to fight with real bullets and under guerilla werfare to ensure their own survival and end the effect of Britain on their land. And the same could be said of the leaders of any country in the world.
Every system of government and society you see in effect today (good and bad) is a direct response to someone's "erratic" idea that may have seem so out of place and negative AT THAT TIME, BUT YIELDED THE WORLD WE LIVE IN TODAY!
Whether you think this world is good or bad is irrelevant because the fact that you are able to think that without being prosecuted is due to those people who "went against the current and keeped going even when the current got tougher and tougher with obstacles along the way"!
(66)
