Tell A Friend   Advertising Information  Contact Us  

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   DR1 Dominican Republic Forums > Message Archives > Election 2004
Register Blogs FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Chat Room

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-06-2004, 07:00 PM
Gold
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 507
Tordok Level 1 (16)
Default presidential vs. general elections

Is anyone aware of any serious civic efforts to re-reform the electoral process, i.e., having congressional and municipal elections simultaneously with the presidential contest? I believe it was made what it is today via a constitutional ammendment following the last of Balaguer's fiascos.
No matter who wins the upcoming presidential election, the congress is still under the control of a bunch of brutes for a minimum of 2 more years. They are, for example, currently railroading changes in the laws that protect national parks with the support of lameduck presidente Hippo and it will be rather difficult to reverse such self-serving laws if the new president is unable to get support in the chamber od deputies and senate.
These elected officials (many are actual criminals) are also protected by parliamentary immunity and seem untouchable. Any comments?
-Tordok
  #2  
Old 05-06-2004, 08:36 PM
Gold
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 958
deelt Level 1 (10)
Default Darn!

That's the law that needs to change. If they are proven to be corrupt, then we can get them out faster. Start with Hipolito and work your way down. Last week Hipolito was asked what he would do to curb corruption. You know what he said? "It's hard to put away friends." 'nuf said. 'E Pa' Fuera Que Va'!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tordok
These elected officials (many are actual criminals) are also protected by parliamentary immunity and seem untouchable. Any comments?
-Tordok
  #3  
Old 05-06-2004, 09:36 PM
Ken Ken is offline
Gold
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,208
Ken Level 1 (45)
Default

The law was changed because legislators rode into offfice on the coat tails of the presidential candidate. It was felt there was a better chance of legislative candidates being considered on their merits if they were elected in a separate election.

The president in the DR is not without power when confronted with a hostile legislature. He can do more with presidential decrees than is possible in the US, for example.
  #4  
Old 05-07-2004, 05:23 PM
Gold
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 507
Tordok Level 1 (16)
Default

Thanks for the input Ken. I believe that you are correct. The Dominican presidency has more relative power than its American counterpart to act unilaterally through executive decrees. That's the tradition, and it has held regardless of who is in majority at the congress.

Unlike in the U.S., the check and balances system in the DR is way tilted to the executive. I see your point about the weighty presidential ticket dragging along party cronies instead of true representatives of the people. But in my view this separation of elections can have the effect of actually perpetuating this imbalance of power in favor of the presidential ticket precisely because in practice, it is the palacio nacional where the real power emanates from, and people tend to view the congressional branch as irrelevant.

-Tordok
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1996-2008.  DR1. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO