Tell A Friend   Advertising Information  Contact Us  

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   DR1 Dominican Republic Forums > Forums > Environment

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-01-2006, 07:28 PM
Bronze
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 60
membruce Level 1 (10)
Question Gen Gas and deforestation?

I mentioned this to Chris in a PM and she suggested that I post the question.

There is a technology known as (among other things) Gen Gas power. It allows a modified gasoline engine to run on wood. A small amount of wood is burned in a chamber. The heat from this combustion heats the rest of the wood that then gives off combustible gases. The gases are then used to run the engine.

The thing is that the system can be designed to produce charcoal as a by product. The argument is that charcoal production is culturally and economically ingrained in many developing countries. With the charcoal pits, the gases go to waist. By capturing this gas with a well designed reactor, an engine could for example produce electric power. This argument means that the environment is better off because the gas is produced anyhow during the normal production of charcoal. We are just tapping this source.

I wanted some opinions on this. I am concerned that the added value of charcoal production could make production more attractive and increase deforestation.

Thanks,
Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-01-2006, 08:24 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,454
Chris Level 3 Chris Level 3 (163)
Default

Geez, but you ask difficult questions.

What comes to mind from experience here and in Africa... Yes charcoal production is ingrained... but I think economically. Culturally I would hazard a guess that it is there, because of economic necessity. If you read studies of developing nations where specifically women are supplied with stoves that function with something else than charcoal, and is easier to use, or uses less fossil fuel, the 'adoption rate' of the new technology is high. The women use their stoves.

So, if there is a new clean technology that as a byproduct produces either charcoal, or some kind of electricity, I think the one that is easiest to use and integrate into the life of the people in the developing country, will be adopted. If there is no need for charcoal, people will not make it regardless.

My opinion only.. for what its worth....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1996-2008.  DR1. All Rights Reserved.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO