Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asopao
Because that's the sad reality of DR, tiguere. If the sisters were " prietas" with " pelo malo", i bet you you wouldn't even hear about them.
|
You mean the way Gregorio Luperón is not remembered... oh, wait a minute....
there is a prieto with pelo malo that is, no... it can't be.... remembered in the most heroically way possible???? I mean, streets are named after him, monuments of him are in many places, he is given a good amount of attention in the history books.
So much for your "prietos with pelo malo are ignored in Dominican history" assumption.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by asopao
Montro, you still keep mixing apples and oranges when it comes to history. If you talking about Dessalines, there wasn't even Dominicans back then !
 DR wasn't a State yet. The " Spanish-speaking Eastern Hispaniolans", what racist hispanophiles want to call " Dominicans" before 1844 to encite nationalism for their advantage, many were collaborating with Ferrand, in making incursions into Haiti to " kidnap children and sell them into slavery". You tell me, why I didn't see that written down on my history book when i was a kid??
|
Um, did you ever read that before the Dominican state was created, the colony was called Santo Domingo and the inhabitants were referred to as Dominicanos because of the "Domingo" part of the Santo Domingo name of the colony?
Of course not, because had you been acquainted with how the colony came to be and what its inhabitants were called WAY IN THE 1600s AND 1700s, you would've understand where the name DOMINICAN came from, hence the name Dominican Republic, as in the Republic of the Dominicans, los dominicanos. No one ever referred to Santo Domingo residents as Santo Domingans, it was always Dominicanos.
Get your historical facts straight!
As for the rest of your comments, well, get some of that self-hatred out of your system and become acquainted with the history of this island before we can talk again.

-NALs