the big difference on the Clinton list is the pardon of terrorists.
i would never agree to any pardon for any terrorist,
doesn't matter how small of a piece he'd been within the blowing network.
just hang 'em all.
the hugest amount of pardons provided above given by US presidents shows minor fellows who also had some time in jail before pardoned, would not have a problem with such. i can not comment on "sales" or such of those, if that's the case i would plee to lock up the corrupt president who sales such(after his period is over, not as a presidentwhich would blame the country as a total), but i am really not that interested in the always the same and boring stu US politics to know about such.
to the theme Venezuela:
i can not see where a orientation towards a Chavez influence would be for the DR worse than a US oriented one.
it would bring us at least very cheap fuel for our dry power plants, a very important factor when running a country which is relying completely on that fuel for absolutely everything.
republicans or democrats??
heck, who cares what partybook a corrupt pardons selling president has in his pocket,
corrupt is corrupt,
selling his country is selling his country,
he should get investigated and sentenced AFTER his period is done, and for the abuse of the highest and most honorable position in the country he should get sentenced harder than any other corrupt gubmin member.
that's not meant US specific,
i mean that as an over all, valid for every country.
than higher and more powerful the position of the abuser than harder the sentence should be.
Mike
Last edited by MikeFisher; 01-13-2009 at 06:57 PM..
Reason: typos
|