Dominican Republic Lawyer
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   DR1 Dominican Republic Forums > Forums > Legal

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-01-2004, 10:58 AM
Bronze
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2
Carola Level 1 (10)
Default immigration bill, which one?

Quote:
Immigration bill passes first step
The Senate approved a first reading of the new legislation regarding immigration. The legislation characterizes temporary workers as non-residents and denies citizenship to any children born to them while they have not achieved residence status in the country. The projected bill also creates the National Immigration Council and the National Institute on Immigration. The National Council on Immigration will act as a “coordinating organization for the institutions that are responsible for the application of the national policy on migration, and will act as an advisor to the State.” The Council will be made up of the ministers of the Interior and the Police, the Armed Forces, the Foreign Relations, Tourism, Public Works, Labor, Public Health, Agriculture, and the JCE. The new proposal defines temporary workers as “those foreigners who enter the national territory for a certain period of time, under contract, either as individuals or in groups.” Moreover, “for the present law, the seasonal contracts of the sugar industry will be considered to be work contracts for a specified period of time.” This means that sugar cane cutters and other workers brought into the country for the sugar harvest will become “non-residents” and, as per Article 10 of the proposed bill, this implies that they will be considered “persons in transit” for the purpose of applying Article 11 of the Dominican Constitution, which defines Dominican citizens as those “persons born in the territory of the Republic, with the exception of those legitimate children of foreign diplomatic residents in the country or those who are in transit there.”
The status of children of Haitian migrants for years has been a touchy issue. There is the concern that to legalize their status as Dominican nationals would serve as an incentive for Haitian migration to increase, placing further social burdens on the continually declining social resources available in the DR. In practice, these services are currently being provided to the illegal Haitian residents, who already consume a large share of public hospital and school services.
Hello, just looking for more information on this bill. What is the number/name of this bill? What news source did DR1 have for this story? I've looked in the Listin Diario, Diario Libre amd Hoy website and there is no mention of this.
From what I understand of Dominican Law, this new bill essentially makes concrete what has been happening over decades, namely, giving hard legal footing to considering Haitian workers as "in transit." To date, this application of the law has simply been an interpretation of the law, whereas the billwould give Dominicans solid ground on which to consider haitian workers ineligible for civil registration.
Please correct me if my reading of this is wrong.
Another question: If this bil passes, what of the haitian workers in the bateyes whose parnts were brought genreations ago by Trujillo? Would they also be considered in transit?
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2004, 10:32 PM
ditz
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,239
Jane J. Level 1 (10)
Default

The report came from El Caribe. Here is the link to the story.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2004, 07:09 PM
DR1 Expert
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,395
Fabio J. Guzman Level 2 Fabio J. Guzman Level 2 (143)
Default

The immigration bill has a long way to go yet. It just passed a first reading in the Senate. It still has to survive a second reading in the Senate, two readings in the Chamber of Deputies and a possible veto by the President.

The bill is extremely controversial and several versions have been approved in first readings several years in a row and never made it into law.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

The contents of this webpage are copyright © 1996-2008.  DR1. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO