Quote:
Originally Posted by Lapurr
Yes it is discriminatory and completely unethical, A woman that want's to earn a living to support her child what difference does it make she is expecting? as long as she can perform her duties to her best ability.
If she is the one that is best suited for the position, then it would be in the best intrest of the company to ensure she came back after her maternity.
those are my thoughts...
|
I appreciate all the responses, though my next question is, what are the ramifications if you are caught doing this (secretly testing) and the potential employee can prove it?
Also, what if the woman gets hired and becomes pregnant before the three month (90) period? Does a woman have to tell their employer they are pregnant during this time? Does a woman have to say she is pregnant before she is hired?
Are maternity leave and compensation affected if she becomes pregnant before or after she is hired?
As per Lapurr's comments, I would doubt anyone disagrees about someone's right to care for their family or that the best person get the job. But my concern isn't that, rather protecting a potential employer against fraud. In the DR, laws are geared towards protecting the employee, which is great considering what I've seen how employees get treated here, but knowing this I know many workers take advantage of laws and "scam" their bosses out of a lot of money. So that's the perspective I am asking these questions from.
Mr. Lu