Quote:
Originally Posted by Berzin
...I see. You advise your daughter and hopes she listens, Yet I tell it like I've seen it and all of a sudden I need statistics to prove my point.
|
Yes, to prove your point that women 'looking for action' in the DR are more vulnerable than men. I contend both genders are equally vulnerable to scammers and scoundrels, and perhaps, one may argue more men, taking into consideration that there're more women 'street walkers and hustlers'.
Quote:
|
...You really think women who've been abused by their third world novios go on chatlines to discuss how they've been treated? No, they suffer in silence because of the shame and embarrassment. And what proof do I need? What I have seen.
|
I've seen many on DR1, do a search if you don't believe me. Need credible evidence to substantiate this assertion. What you've seen may be an aberration.
Quote:
|
... And why are you throwing my past into this? What are you, the DR1 morality police?
|
No, I didn't. I simply stated what you posted previously, i.e. you've had your share of casual sexual encounters. If the OP was inclined to experience that, she's free to 'do it' ad infinitum. There was no allusion to immorality, however, if you think it's immoral, I can't argue.
Quote:
|
... It sounds like you just want to attack me just for the sake of attacking me. My points had NOTHING to do with morality, but of safety.
|
No again. I didn't attack you nor do I claim monopoly on morality. I simply provided a depiction of Swaggart, who undoubtedly has no authority to judge anyone.
Quote:
|
... But of course you read into it and twist it around because you just want to be an A-hole. Well, congrats on that one. Mission accomplished.
|
No again. I was stating my opinion and if you think I'm an A-hole, that's your opinion. You should be aware that I've been called that a few times in the past, but it was complimentary and preceded with "Sir".
Adults are free to do as they wish and we're NOT responsible for anyone's actions and behaviour.
Have a pleasant day.