You get back all the evidence they used to take into consideration for the decision in a Certifed Tribunal Record (CTR) at the point that leave is granted (basically at the point at which the judge decides if you have enough substance to your case for it to go through.)
If you find that there are things written in the CAIPS notes or the record which you did not have a chance to respond to, you have a case. If there are many things which you didn't have a chance to respond to, or irrelevant considerations, you may have a case for consent. Really depends, if it is weighing on 1 or 2 small things, even if it is redetermined, it might not go favorably for, if there are lots, then it could go well. Based on the timelines given, and the cost of lawyers, it may not be a bad idea to reapply, in that 1) it may take less time than an appeal 2) may be cheaper, 3) proves that you are serious. The imporant thing is consistancy between the first and second application. If you have just been denied, and are still within the 60 day period, you can do an ATIP request to get the info they used in making their decision, and try to strengthen what appeared to be weak, and supplying new evidence.
I'm really not sure, it seems that reapplying may be the way to go, unless there is some gross negligence, and taking it to court could set a precedence, or be consented upon quickly, it seems as though taking it to court might not gain anything. It could take a bunch of time before a verdict is reached, and if that verdict is negative for you, then you have lost time in which your application could be processed.
It's a tough say.
|