I take great issue with that article. It's a piece written for feeling and it is ridciously spun, so spun out of control infact that it made me dizzy.
The whole thing is one yellow journalistic piece based upon partial facts attacking a company. Obviously the author had an axe to grind.
Is monsanto bad? Does it really matter and if it does I sure won't try to learn anything from a piece like that.
The seeds are not sold, they are being donated. A farmer was quoted (in the article) as saying "Help us produce, not just give us food" well heck, I think that it falls extactly at that.
Food aid isn't new to Haiti anyhow. How many years has it been going on for?
food aid haiti - Google Search
It's so easy to hate Big Evil Corporation X that it blind sides one. They are donating non-GMO seeds, seeds which don't fall under their patents. If the "Haitian" population (or rather the ones with the power to call the shots) doesn't want them, fine. But you just watch, they will be crying out for food aid soon. Food dumping ("aid") DOES destroy countries, economies and lives. How ever food production does not. Next time famine because of reason X,Y,Z comes to Haiti and everyone calls out for food dumping (again)...
Oops, guess you should have planted, huh?
Truthout? More like Getout. Maybe what they write counts for Truth in 1984.
Seeds with pesticide? Common practice. This yellow piece tries to equate it to agent orange. Give me a break.
Seeds being DONATED? free and
non-GMO. Which they state at the start but then write the next 2 pages as if they were paid/contracted and GMO seeds.
The rest of the article? NOTHING to do with the situation in Haiti. I do not care what the company and the US government did in Colombia or Vietnam or anywhere else. We are (rather we
were ) talking about Haiti (first 2 paragraphs). Irrelevant.
Bookmarks